25 November 2011 @ 07:25 pm
..pro-lifers decry cat abortions:

Is spaying a pregnant cat abortion?

"I've seen people say on this board that spaying a pregnant cat stops the pregnancy?
How could someone do such a thing!?
That's abortion, and it's just as bad as taking human lives."
 
 
06 June 2011 @ 03:33 pm
The mothers for "life" are a group of mothers who meet at the local plunket. They picket abortion seekers at the hospital, using their babies instead of placards. They dress these kids in hand-printed tops with slogans like "I am a child, not a choice!". I posted awhile ago to my journal saying that whilst I found their actions disgusting, I supported their right to freedom of expression. But now they are pissing me off so much that I think they should be banned.

The other day, they tried to persuade my friend (who has a seven month old baby) to join them. "You're baby was a fetus seven months ago," the president told her. "And would you kill her? The only difference between our babies and theirs is that ours are older. Join us and save the babies.
Then this same woman emailed me saying "Thank you for supporting our cause. Here is some more information about us, and please sign our members bill to ban under 16-year-olds from getting an abortion without their parent's consent
 
 
Current Location: New Zealand
 
 
16 July 2010 @ 06:42 pm
Bus driver claims abortion views led to his firing.

Woman wants to take bus to Planned Parenthood. Bus driver refuses, on the grounds that OMG BORTIUNZ! Bus driver is fired. Bus driver then claims religious discrimination.

I'm not going to get too upset until this isn't laughed out of court. In the meantime... this is where all those fucking conscience clauses for pharmacists inevitably lead. For fuck's sake. I think what pisses me off is the moral cowardice of people who are simultaneously claiming to be great moral martyrs. If something is really that big a deal to you, you should be willing to lose your job over it. The real heroes get arrested, get beaten by cops, get death threats, because they're willing to stand up for what's right and damn the consequences. It reminds me of something a college professor once said, about the difference between civil disobedience and criminal behavior - if your goal is to change the system, you take the consequences and use them to further your cause. If your plan is to get away with it, you're just breaking the law for your own advantage. There are people who will proudly resign rather than do a job that they think is unethical. This guy is just a jerk.

(Comments on the article are not as rage-inducing as I would have feared. There are plenty of people pointing out that a) PP offers lots of non-abortion-related services and b) you don't get to not do your job and then complain that you got fired.)
 
 
10 April 2010 @ 12:42 pm
I'd like to take a moment to brag on my City Council. As of Thursday, we are the second US city (after Baltimore) to require crisis pregnancy centers to post notices at their entrances if they do not offer or refer women to abortion or contraception.

The anti-choicers are of course up in arms and talking about unconstitutional infringements on free speech, but I don't see how this is any more unconstitutional than requiring food manufacturers to print ingredients and nutrition information.

Notices must be at least 8 1/2 by 11 inches large, with at least 48-pt font, in both English and Spanish. They must say, "This center does not provide abortions or refer to abortion providers. This center does not provide or refer to providers of U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved birth control drugs and medical devices."

The measure passed unanimously.
 
 
02 March 2010 @ 12:50 pm
Do you guys know of any kind of engine to search for jobs specifically in the reproductive healthcare / reproductive justice fields?

Thank you.
 
 
* I just wanted to note that I had to take key words from a PRO LIFE article I found on the net, and then do a Google search to find this news, because it didn't come up when I did searches on "pro-choice" or "abortion" alone, and NONE of the major news media seems to have covered it.

Grassley: Dems will get their way during healthcare conference

By Jordan Fabian
The Hill Blog
12/30/09 02:45 PM ET

Sen. Chuck Grassley said Wednesday that Democrats will likely "huddle secretly" to get their way on contested provisions between the two healthcare bills when lawmakers meet to merge them next month.
Read more... )
 
 
Current Mood: betrayed
 
 
U.S. personnel in Iraq could face court-martial for getting pregnant

By Teri Weaver, Stars and Stripes
Mideast edition, Saturday, December 19, 2009
The Army general commanding U.S. forces in northern Iraq has added pregnancy to the list of prohibitions for personnel under his command.

The policy, which went into effect Nov. 4, makes it possible to face punishment, including a court-martial and jail time, for becoming pregnant or impregnating a servicemember, according to the wording of the policy and confirmations from Army officials.
Read more... )
 
 
Current Mood: wtf???
 
 
Hi Friends and Colleagues,

I am writing to urge you to contact the White House and let President Obama know that you are opposed to BOTH the Senate and House versions of the currently propose health care reform.

Like most of you, I too have been filling out petitions, blogging and Twittering about these underhanded attempts in our Congress to violate women's fundamental Constitutional right to abortion. I understand it has become tiring and seems repetitive, but the fact of the matter is that no one in power seems to be listening to the big advocacy organizations like NARAL, Planned Parenthood or NOW, so I think it is time that folks as individuals make their voices heard. Please keep in mind that contacting our Senators did not stop the most recent anti-abortion amendment being pushed through without the approval of the majority of the Senate. In my mind, this means that it has gone beyond the point of people asking their elected officials to look out for their interests. If these officials were able to adequately represent us, we wouldn't have a small cabal of three or four persons (most of them white men, who will never become pregnant), flagrantly ignoring the procedures of the Senate, while being given the approval of The White House in the process.

So, pick up the phone, fax or email The White House TODAY!
They can be reached here: http://www.whitehouse.gov/CONTACT/

I suggest that folks also write letters to the editors of their newspapers, magazines and television stations and DEMAND that they interview local citizens about their opinions regarding this health care reform and the subversion of abortion rights, because I for one am sick and tired of only reading pieces with commentary by the advocacy groups when again, it seems as though those same groups are not being heard or are not engaging in an effective manner with our representatives. The whole thing stinks and feels very gamed to me. In my experience, the best way to effectively deal with these types of situations is to introduce a third party (namely individuals citizens), who can use the internet or other means so that their voices are actually seen and heard.

Here is a thorough explanation as to how the current Nelson amended Senate Bill will restrict women and trans folks' (FTMs and genderqueers) access to abortions and other reproductive health services:
http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/2009/12/20/the-nelson-compromise

Here is a look into the pork barrel bribe that was offered to Senator Nelson and the State of Nebraska in exchange for his 60th vote, which came at the expense of reproductive freedom:
http://biggovernment.com/2009/12/19/sen-nelsons-bribe/

Here is a breakdown of why the health care reform overall is horrible for US people and our future health and financial well being:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/12/19/816961/-Why-This-Senate-Health-Bill-Should-Not-Pass

Yours in Feminist Solidarity!
 
 
Current Mood: determineddetermined
 
 
Senate tables Nelson's abortion amendment 54-45
The Hill Blog
By Michael O'Brien - 12/08/09 05:33 PM ET

Senators voted Tuesday afternoon to set aside a healthcare amendment that would have curbed federal support for abortion coverage.

Senators voted to table a measure from Sens. Ben Nelson (D-Neb.) and Orrin Hatch (R-Utah - correction mine.) that would have banned the government from offering insurance plans in a national healthcare exchange that cover abortion.

The amendment, which needed 60 votes to pass and was not expected to be adopted, was tabled in a 54-45 vote.
Read more... )
 
 
Current Mood: relievedrelieved
 
 
CONTACT YOUR SENATORS NOW!!!! STOP THE NELSON ANTI-ABORTION AMENDMENT IN THE SENATE!

p.s.- Tell them you support a transgender inclusive ENDA while you are at it!

Senate Member's Contact List: http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm
Sign NARAL's petition and watch their new TV ad: https://secure.prochoiceamerica.org/site/Advocacy?cmd=display&page=UserAction&id=4011

NELSON FILES ANTI-ABORTION AMENDMENT

Posted: Monday, December 07, 2009 1:20 PM by Mark Murray
Filed Under: Congress
From NBC's Ken Strickland

Democratic Sen. Ben Nelson today filed an amendment to the Senate health-care bill that places strict restrictions on federal funds going toward abortion services. The amendment is co-sponsored by fellow Democrat Bob Casey and eight Republicans.
Read more... )
 
 
Current Mood: irritatedirritated